Many Filipinos are realizing that
a single, six—year presidential term f President Benigno Aquino III as
prescribed by the 1987 Constitution was dolefully not enough for a good
president like what Benigno S. Aquino III. Delegates who have wrote the provision
in the Philippine Constitution must have been reeling for almost 20 years of “kleptocratic”
decree of the strongman Ferdinand Marcos when they decided that a single term
was enough for any future President of the Philippines. Four years presidential
term at a time would be too short and eight was too long. So delegates have arrived
at 6 years and that’s it.
Six years in one term was just right
for Cory Aquino who hindsight and did not do much as the Philippine president.
Fidel Ramos then could have accomplished more if he had longer term—but he
could not “rock the boat” so after Constitution was promulgated. But for Estrada,
six years was too long for him so he got booted out on office. Gloria Arroyo
lasted 9 years in as president by hoodwinking public into thinking she was really
working for them, but in reality they were working only for themselves.
Now that we have a president who
appears to be doing the right things but his 6—year term ends in the next 2
years. Possible candidate to replace him is Binay who for all intents and
purposes seems to be a typical politician who has the intent of establishing political
dynasty like most of corrupt Filipino politicians do.
Aquino so far brought a lot of
changes on how the way government runs, but given with the entrenched
corruption that was inherent in the population, change happens at a very slow
pace. Much of what Aquino has started will remain unfinished when his term ends
in the next two years.
The question that many people ask
is: should
the flawed constitution the Philippines have to be amended in order for Aquino has
few more years in the office so he can finish what he has started? Presidential
aspirant and DILG Secretary Mar Roxas believe that it is the right thing to do.
Roxas is willing to put out presidential ambitions just to give Aquino few more
years in public office.
The Ampatuan Massacre case and the
accusation against former President Gloria Arroyo, the plunder cases against the
Senators namely Estrada, Revilla and Enrile for starters—are all still pending.
Will a Binay administration be as determined to see these cases to their
conclusion?
For many people, amending the sections
of 1987 “Cory Aquino” Constitution makes more sense as 2016 election draws
near, the fear that all hard-won changes in the past four years will be lost if
traditional Filipino politician win presidency.
No comments:
Post a Comment